Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

Chronary

ai.chronary/mcp

Calendar API for AI agents: events, availability, Google/Microsoft setup, scheduling, and iCal.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher ai.chronary · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://api.chronary.ai/mcp

allow
verdict
rich-slow-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
54
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · action ● · V n/a
allow — because answers ●, 54 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 2 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (0 runs)

Cluster rich-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.805 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency598 ms
vs populationslow
protocolcurrent
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools54
vs populationhigh
capabilities3
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_557930bacab4b6c4ecc87507 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 2 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?action ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?rich-slow-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
action33changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
retrieval-public19serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
predictive1claims about the futurescoreable only in retrospect — the archive scores yesterday's predictions against today's outcome
unclassified1not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves

Tools last seen observed

accept_terms cancel_connection_link cancel_event cancel_proposal clear_availability_rules confirm_event create_agent create_booking_page create_calendar create_connection_link create_event create_proposal create_scoped_key create_webhook delete_agent delete_booking_page delete_calendar delete_ical_subscription delete_webhook find_meeting_time get_agent get_audit_log get_availability get_availability_rules get_booking_page get_calendar get_calendar_context get_connection_link get_event get_ical_subscription get_proposal get_usage get_webhook list_agents list_booking_pages list_calendars list_events list_ical_subscriptions list_proposals list_scoped_keys list_webhook_deliveries list_webhooks release_event resolve_proposal respond_to_proposal revoke_scoped_key set_availability_rules subscribe_ical sync_ical_subscription update_agent update_calendar update_event update_ical_subscription update_webhook

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific54/54
has a description54/54
description is substantive53/5453/54
parameters are typed54/54
parameters are described54/54

54 of 54 tools graded · 54 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
1.0.0
server version chronary

Capabilities: prompts resources tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:57:34Zok_tools2005982025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:32:52Zok_tools2001012025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/ai.chronary/mcp.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/ai.chronary/mcp)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview