Did it hold?
Where a public answer key exists, we re-derive the server’s answer from the official source ourselves. So far: 69 of 75 decided checks agreed — and 1,157 attempts told us nothing, which we say plainly instead of counting either way.
8 ● servers verified true, of 609 ● attempted, of 6,040 ● that answer. An attempt is not a verification.
as of 2026-08-14 · counts are doors
The verified
- io.github.SoapyRED/freightutils — 23/23 agree · icc-incoterms-2020, iso-6346, unece-unlocode, wco-hs-2022
- eu.tradedashboard/eu-trade-explorer — 15/15 agree · eurostat-comext, wco-hs-2022
- io.github.pipeworx-io/hts — 14/14 agree · usitc-hts
- com.bonissystems/ofac-sdn-screening — 10/10 agree · ofac-sdn
- ai.duvera/gateway — 1/1 agree · ecb-fx
- ai.dynamicfeed/dynamic-feed — 1/1 agree · ecb-fx
- ai.ohmyfin/banking-intelligence — 1/1 agree · ecb-fx
- io.github.cyanheads/usaspending-mcp-server — 1/1 agree · us-usaspending
Per claim class
Stability
Decided checks are re-asked daily; 0 verdict flips since the lane opened — a rate limit is not a contradiction, and never counted as one.
Attempted, nothing decided — this is not a rating
Top 20 of 596 shown. Schema walls, rate limits, and unmappable parameters land here — our coverage gap, not their failure.
Lanes wired: trade reference · US duty (USITC) · EU values (Eurostat) · sanctions (OFAC) · FX (ECB). Walled servers cannot be checked from outside and are not counted.