Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

Forge Engine

app.forgeengine/forge

Design spec + milestones AI coding agents read before building; drift flagged, changes reviewed.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher app.forgeengine · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://mmvdabzadclebfxyzudg.supabase.co/functions/v1/forge-mcp

allow
verdict
rich-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
54
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · retrieval-public ● · V1 shows its work ◐
allow — because answers ●, 54 tools legible (band B) ●, no confirmed drift in 2 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (0 runs)

Cluster rich-solo · distinctiveness 0.413 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency276 ms
vs populationtypical
protocolcurrent
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools54
vs populationhigh
capabilities1
harnessB
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_bdf45b3a33f08c9d0c3ccfb0 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 2 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?retrieval-public ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V1 shows its work ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness B · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?rich-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
retrieval-public26serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
action14changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
unclassified12not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
generative2creates contentno answer key exists; disclosure + stability checks, never truth verdicts

Tools last seen observed

add_task dedupe delete_entity design_ui_from_systems get_balance get_briefing get_build_region get_design_document get_help get_history get_impact get_inbox get_milestone get_project_context get_project_meta get_rejections get_screen get_screen_image get_stale get_system get_workflow import_from_code list_activity list_milestones list_projects list_screens list_systems next_task post_log propose_balance_board propose_balance_table propose_context propose_dna propose_element propose_flow_edge propose_milestone propose_screen propose_system rename_screen reorder report_build_status report_drift report_milestone_progress report_screen_status resolve_rejection resync_from_idea search set_design_overview trace_ui_from_image update_element update_milestone update_system update_task withdraw_proposal

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band B — usable, with rough edges.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific54/54
has a description54/54
description is substantive54/54
parameters are typed54/54
parameters are described3/543/54

54 of 54 tools graded · 54 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
0.1.0
server version forge

Capabilities: tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:57:44Zok_tools2002762025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:33:01Zok_tools2002592025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/app.forgeengine/forge.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/app.forgeengine/forge)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview