olympus bets analytics
com.olympus-bets/olympus-bets-analytics
Quant sports analytics: 19 read-only tools across 12 leagues, projections, methods, track record.
— the operator's own registry description reported
Publisher com.olympus-bets · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://app.olympus-bets.com/mcp
Dependency rating derived
allow — alive & usable · retrieval-public ● · V1 shows its work ◐
Cluster mid-solo · distinctiveness 0.48 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.
🔏 Signed receipt rr_040e3c9491e21a224fdc65b0 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.
● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →
History observed
Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.
changelog (1 events)
| date | type | what changed |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-12 | outcome | first probe: ok_tools |
What kind of tools these are derived
Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):
| nature | tools | meaning | what checking applies |
|---|---|---|---|
| retrieval-public | 10 | serves public facts | truth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full |
| predictive | 6 | claims about the future | scoreable only in retrospect — the archive scores yesterday's predictions against today's outcome |
| generative | 4 | creates content | no answer key exists; disclosure + stability checks, never truth verdicts |
Tools last seen observed
Harness readiness observed
Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band B — usable, with rough edges.
| legibility check | tools passing | ok |
|---|---|---|
| name is clear & specific | 20/20 | ✓ |
| has a description | 20/20 | ✓ |
| description is substantive | 20/20 | ✓ |
| parameters are typed | 20/20 | ✓ |
| parameters are described | 3/20 | 3/20 |
20 of 20 tools graded · 20 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.
Truth checks observed
Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.
Protocol conformance observed
Capabilities: experimental prompts resources tools
Drift observed
No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.
raw probe records
| probed (UTC) | outcome | http | ms | protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14T19:58:21Z | ok_tools | 200 | 256 | 2025-06-18 |
| 2026-08-12T05:33:36Z | ok_tools | 200 | 330 | 2025-06-18 |
Watch or embed this verdict
Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:
[](https://robinsaige.com/s/com.olympus-bets/olympus-bets-analytics)
Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.