Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

Professor Sausages — Trust & Verification

com.professorsausages/sausage-trust

Email, phone, domain, URL & OFAC verification; phishing and IBAN checks via x402.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher com.professorsausages · first seen 2026-08-15 · endpoint https://x402.professorsausages.com/mcp/trust

allow
verdict
mid-shared
cluster
ok_tools
answers
12
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · kind unknown · V n/a
allow — because answers ●, 12 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 1 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (2 attempts unverifiable, 0 disagreements)

Cluster mid-shared · distinctiveness 0.108 (typical). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,363-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency162 ms
vs populationtypical
protocolcurrent
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools12
vs populationmid
capabilities2
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identityshared
servers on its host4
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers true0/0 agree

🔏 Signed receipt rr_c88004b8f23f74e1fcc21004 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 1 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?kind unknown ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?mid-shared · 4 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (1 shown, 2026-08-16 → 2026-08-16). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-16outcomefirst probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
unclassified6not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
retrieval-public5serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
computational1deterministic transformsself-checkable by re-computation and known-answer tests

Tools last seen observed

address_screen domain_intel email_check find_data iban_check phone_check pricing request_data sanctions_entity sanctions_screen url_screen vessel_screen

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific12/12
has a description12/12
description is substantive12/12
parameters are typed12/12
parameters are described12/12

12 of 12 tools graded · 12 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not yet confirmed — 2 attempt(s) currently unverifiable (rate limits, walls, or unmappable schemas — never counted against the server) · 0 disagreements.

claim classkeyverdictprimary source
OFAC SDN screening (vs the official list)ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPSunverifiableofac-sdn
OFAC SDN screening (vs the official list)MAERSK LINEunverifiableofac-sdn

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
1.0.0
server version sausage-trust

Capabilities: prompts tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-16; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-16T06:11:57Zok_tools2001622025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/com.professorsausages/sausage-trust.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/com.professorsausages/sausage-trust)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview

Operator of this server? Everything we hold about it is on this page — free, no account, for anyone. Wrong attribution, stale probe, misclassification? Dispute this record →