Should my agent depend on the MCP server io.github.deriveit33z-ship-it/x402-apis?

Verdict: allow — stale-mid-fast-solo — safe to depend on As of 2026-09-06T06:21:45Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

DeriveAI x402 APIs

io.github.deriveit33z-ship-it/x402-apis

25 pay-per-request intelligence APIs for AI agents via x402 micropayments (USDC/Base)

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.deriveit33z-ship-it · first seen 2026-08-20 · endpoint https://x402-apis-eta.vercel.app/api/mcp

allow

verdict

stale-mid-fast-solo

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · kind unknown · V n/a

allow — because answers ●, 25 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 3 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (3 attempts unverifiable, 0 disagreements)

Cluster stale-mid-fast-solo · distinctiveness 0.404 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 15,472-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed

answersalive_tools

latency71 ms

vs populationfast

protocolbehind

authopen

Can it be used? Q4 · observed

tools25

vs populationhigh

capabilities1

harnessA

Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived

identitysolo

servers on its host1

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers true0/0 agree

🔏 Signed receipt rr_ccb8b28bed6acde7a99596fc · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 3 probes ●evidence ↓

Q2What is it?kind unknown ● evidence ↓

Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓

Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓

Q5What company does it keep?stale-mid-fast-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (3 shown, 2026-08-23 → 2026-09-06). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-23	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

nature	tools	meaning	what checking applies
unclassified	16	not classifiable from its text	Tier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
action	4	changes the world	no true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
computational	2	deterministic transforms	self-checkable by re-computation and known-answer tests
generative	1	creates content	no answer key exists; disclosure + stability checks, never truth verdicts
orchestration	1	routes other tools	identity + fronted-service disclosure checks (gateway vs costume)
retrieval-public	1	serves public facts	truth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full

Tools last seen observed

arabic_sentiment arabizi_translate brand_scout company_report competitor_analysis crypto_data currency_convert detect_language domain_enrich domain_infra due_diligence email_audit gold_price ip_intel legal_simplifier prayer_times profanity_filter scrape_structured screenshot site_audit text_summarize username_osint verify_email weather_data web_scrape

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	25/25	✓
has a description	25/25	✓
description is substantive	25/25	✓
parameters are typed	25/25	✓
parameters are described	25/25	✓

25 of 25 tools graded · 25 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not yet confirmed — 3 attempt(s) currently unverifiable (rate limits, walls, or unmappable schemas — never counted against the server) · 0 disagreements.

claim class	key	verdict	primary source
fx-rates	EURUSD	unverifiable	ecb-fx
OFAC SDN screening (vs the official list)	ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS	unverifiable	ofac-sdn
OFAC SDN screening (vs the official list)	MAERSK LINE	unverifiable	ofac-sdn

Protocol conformance observed

2025-03-26

protocol version

—

session model

1.0.0

server version x402-gcc-apis

Capabilities: tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-09-06; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-09-06T06:15:55Z	ok_tools	200	71	2025-03-26
2026-08-30T06:15:31Z	ok_tools	200	105	2025-03-26
2026-08-23T06:13:17Z	ok_tools	200	114	2025-03-26

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.deriveit33z-ship-it/x402-apis.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.deriveit33z-ship-it/x402-apis)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview

Operator of this server? Everything we hold about it is on this page — free, no account, for anyone. Wrong attribution, stale probe, misclassification? Dispute this record →