Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

market

xyz.sputnikx/market

Sputnik X: EU trade 63M+, LV customs, salary, sanctions, EU AI Act, SoulLedger + x402 USDC.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher xyz.sputnikx · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://mcp.sputnikx.xyz/mcp

allow
verdict
mid-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
16
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · kind unknown · V n/a
allow — because answers ●, 16 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 37 probes ●, truth 0/2 agree vs primary ●

Cluster mid-solo · distinctiveness 0.365 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 15,472-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency295 ms
vs populationtypical
protocolcurrent
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools16
vs populationmid
capabilities2
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers true0/2 agree

🔏 Signed receipt rr_8d01e2bfa4850e44b1d620df · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 37 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?kind unknown ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth 0/2 agree · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?mid-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (37 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-09-10). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (2 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-09-05outcomeok_tools (was http_error)
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: http_error

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
unclassified6not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
retrieval-public5serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
action2changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
computational2deterministic transformsself-checkable by re-computation and known-answer tests
predictive1claims about the futurescoreable only in retrospect — the archive scores yesterday's predictions against today's outcome

Tools last seen observed

daloopa_query front_run_watch fusion_capabilities get_prices mt_newswires_query prediction_signals search_products soul_bounties soul_insights soul_leaderboard soul_profile soul_stack_feed soul_verify think wave_portfolio wave_signal

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific16/16✓
has a description16/16✓
description is substantive16/16✓
parameters are typed16/16✓
parameters are described16/16✓

16 of 16 tools graded · 16 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

0/2 answers agree with the published primary source.

claim classkeyverdictprimary source
tariff-duty0901.21.00disagreesus-hts
tariff-duty6109.10.00disagreesus-hts

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
—
session model
2.0.0
server version granulas

Capabilities: resources tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-09-06; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-09-10T05:10:48Zok_tools2003002025-06-18
2026-09-09T05:10:48Zok_tools2003062025-06-18
2026-09-08T05:10:36Zok_tools2003042025-06-18
2026-09-07T05:10:46Zok_tools2003922025-06-18
2026-09-06T06:18:21Zok_tools2002952025-06-18
2026-09-06T05:10:09Zok_tools2003262025-06-18
2026-09-05T05:10:49Zok_tools2003072025-06-18
2026-09-04T05:10:02Zhttp_error500305
2026-09-03T05:10:09Zhttp_error500297
2026-09-02T05:10:05Zhttp_error500304
2026-09-01T05:10:09Zhttp_error500309
2026-08-31T05:10:09Zhttp_error500300
2026-08-30T06:18:01Zhttp_error500310
2026-08-30T05:10:09Zhttp_error500292
2026-08-29T05:10:02Zhttp_error500317
2026-08-28T05:10:09Zhttp_error500310
2026-08-27T05:10:09Zhttp_error500304
2026-08-26T05:10:07Zhttp_error500527
2026-08-25T05:10:09Zhttp_error500301
2026-08-24T05:10:09Zhttp_error500310
2026-08-23T06:15:06Zhttp_error500334
2026-08-23T05:10:09Zhttp_error500305
2026-08-22T05:10:08Zhttp_error500300
2026-08-21T05:10:10Zhttp_error500303
2026-08-20T05:10:08Zhttp_error500314
2026-08-19T05:10:09Zhttp_error500621
2026-08-18T05:10:09Zhttp_error500297
2026-08-17T05:10:09Zhttp_error500303
2026-08-16T06:14:27Zhttp_error500312
2026-08-16T05:10:09Zhttp_error500299

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/xyz.sputnikx/market.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/xyz.sputnikx/market)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview

Operator of this server? Everything we hold about it is on this page — free, no account, for anyone. Wrong attribution, stale probe, misclassification? Dispute this record →