Should my agent depend on the MCP server com.rqmtechnologies/waveengine?

Verdict: allow — rich-slow-shared — safe to depend on As of 2026-09-13T06:22:43Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

RQM WaveEngine Jobs

com.rqmtechnologies/waveengine

Delegate 20 typed, evidence-backed WaveEngine signal work products with fixed-request x402.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher com.rqmtechnologies · first seen 2026-08-17 · endpoint https://jobs.rqmtechnologies.com/mcp/waveengine

allow

verdict

rich-slow-shared

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · kind unknown · V n/a

allow — because answers ●, 34 tools legible (band B) ●, no confirmed drift in 4 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (0 runs)

Cluster rich-slow-shared · distinctiveness 0.709 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 19,148-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed

answersalive_tools

latency3024 ms

vs populationslow

protocolcurrent

authopen

Can it be used? Q4 · observed

tools34

vs populationhigh

capabilities1

harnessB

Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived

identityshared

servers on its host4

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_e0390c69a7963034034fc0ec · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 4 probes ●evidence ↓

Q2What is it?kind unknown ● evidence ↓

Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓

Q4Did it hold?harness B · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓

Q5What company does it keep?rich-slow-shared · 4 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (4 shown, 2026-08-23 → 2026-09-13). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (2 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-09-13	outcome	ok_tools (was http_error)
2026-08-23	outcome	first probe: http_error

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

nature	tools	meaning	what checking applies
unclassified	13	not classifiable from its text	Tier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
retrieval-public	12	serves public facts	truth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
action	4	changes the world	no true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
computational	4	deterministic transforms	self-checkable by re-computation and known-answer tests
generative	1	creates content	no answer key exists; disclosure + stability checks, never truth verdicts

Tools last seen observed

estimate_wave_job get_wave_capability get_wave_example get_wave_job_artifact get_wave_job_result get_wave_job_status get_wave_receipt list_buyer_jobs list_wave_capabilities run_buyer_job run_wave_example run_wave_job search_buyer_jobs search_wave_capabilities wave_apply_verified_phase_correction_v1 wave_compare_pipeline_responses_v1 wave_compare_waveform_captures_v1 wave_compile_curated_processing_recipe_v1 wave_convert_capture_to_spectrum_v1 wave_diagnose_multichannel_capture_v1 wave_equalize_pilot_capture_v1 wave_extract_wave_features_v1 wave_fit_coupled_channel_model_v1 wave_gate_signal_capture_v1 wave_generate_validated_signal_fixture_v1 wave_measure_phase_drift_v1 wave_optimize_processing_pipeline_v1 wave_reconstruct_bounded_capture_v1 wave_reconstruct_time_domain_signal_v1 wave_rotate_and_validate_two_channel_frame_v1 wave_transport_polarization_frame_v1 wave_validate_reconstruction_quality_v1 wave_validate_spectral_criteria_v1 wave_verify_wave_pipeline_v1

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band B — usable, with rough edges.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	34/34	✓
has a description	34/34	✓
description is substantive	34/34	✓
parameters are typed	34/34	✓
parameters are described	2/34	2/34

34 of 34 tools graded · 34 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18

protocol version

—

session model

1.7.0

server version com.rqmtechnologies/waveengine

Capabilities: tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-09-13; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-09-13T06:13:37Z	ok_tools	200	3024	2025-06-18
2026-09-06T06:12:56Z	http_error	400	83
2026-08-30T06:12:38Z	http_error	400	396
2026-08-23T06:12:11Z	http_error	400	31

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/com.rqmtechnologies/waveengine.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/com.rqmtechnologies/waveengine)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview

Operator of this server? Everything we hold about it is on this page — free, no account, for anyone. Wrong attribution, stale probe, misclassification? Dispute this record →