Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

SALT19 Agent Utility Grid

io.github.GabrielAllit1/salt19-agent-utility-grid

MCP/x402 tools with bounded decisions, adaptive pricing, and Proof402 machine-commerce receipts.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.GabrielAllit1 · first seen 2026-08-24 · endpoint https://api.salt19.com/mcp

allow
verdict
rich-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
33
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · generative ● · V n/a
allow — because answers ●, 33 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 2 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (0 runs)

Cluster rich-solo · distinctiveness 0.364 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 15,472-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency111 ms
vs populationtypical
protocolleading
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools33
vs populationhigh
capabilities1
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_13e48ab477cf9ccd1bcac849 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 2 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?generative ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?rich-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-30 → 2026-09-06). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-30outcomefirst probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
generative11creates contentno answer key exists; disclosure + stability checks, never truth verdicts
retrieval-public8serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
action7changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
unclassified6not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
orchestration1routes other toolsidentity + fronted-service disclosure checks (gateway vs costume)

Tools last seen observed

agent-claim-output-verifier agent-code-change-risk-gate agent-decision-preflight agent-plan-verifier base-contract-state base-token-allowance base-token-balance base-transaction-status base-wallet-balance commerce-decision commerce-receipt commerce-verify dependency-go-no-go dependency-upgrade-go-no-go find-salt19-tool github-repo-facts github-repo-preflight model-memory-fit npm-package-facts npm-package-intel nws-active-alerts repo-adoption-go-no-go report-payment-capability report-x402-authorization-progress salt19-pricing sec-company-facts sec-recent-filings url-http-preflight url-to-llm-markdown usgs-earthquakes verify-decision-receipt x402-authorization-handoff x402-payment-preflight

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific33/33
has a description33/33
description is substantive33/33
parameters are typed31/3331/33
parameters are described16/3316/33

33 of 33 tools graded · 33 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-11-25
protocol version
session model
0.5.0
server version salt19-agent-utility-grid

Capabilities: tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-09-06; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-09-06T06:15:16Zok_tools2001112025-11-25
2026-08-30T06:14:51Zok_tools2001582025-11-25

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.GabrielAllit1/salt19-agent-utility-grid.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.GabrielAllit1/salt19-agent-utility-grid)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview

Operator of this server? Everything we hold about it is on this page — free, no account, for anyone. Wrong attribution, stale probe, misclassification? Dispute this record →