Should my agent depend on the MCP server io.github.TAMA-FIT/agent-commerce-readiness?

Verdict: warn — alive-toolless — usable, but look before you lean on it As of 2026-09-13T06:22:43Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

agent commerce readiness

io.github.TAMA-FIT/agent-commerce-readiness

Publisher io.github.TAMA-FIT · first seen 2026-09-13 · endpoint https://agent-commerce-readiness-tlxjvcrika-an.a.run.app/mcp

warn

verdict

alive-toolless

cluster

answers

—

tools served

Dependency rating derived

warn
warn — alive, no tools · kind unknown · V n/a

warn — because answers ●, no confirmed drift in 1 probes ●; not yet checked: harness, truth (0 runs)

Cluster alive-toolless · distinctiveness 0.232 (typical). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 19,148-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed

answersalive_no_tools

latency196 ms

vs populationtypical

protocolleading

authopen

Can it be used? Q4 · observed

capabilities1

Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived

identityfarm_member

servers on its host1

servers on its domain16

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_a92d6b726a43e43a4307ba8d · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive, no tools — 1 probes ●evidence ↓

Q2What is it?kind unknown evidence ↓

Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓

Q4Did it hold?truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓

Q5What company does it keep?alive-toolless · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (1 shown, 2026-09-13 → 2026-09-13). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-09-13	outcome	first probe: ok

Tools last seen observed

no tool inventory served

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-11-25

protocol version

—

session model

0.2.0

server version agent-commerce-readiness

Capabilities: tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-09-13; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-09-13T06:16:20Z	ok	200	196	2025-11-25

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.TAMA-FIT/agent-commerce-readiness.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.TAMA-FIT/agent-commerce-readiness)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview

Operator of this server? Everything we hold about it is on this page — free, no account, for anyone. Wrong attribution, stale probe, misclassification? Dispute this record →