Should my agent depend on the MCP server ai.geodesiclabs/governance-platform?

Verdict: allow — rich-solo — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

governance platform

ai.geodesiclabs/governance-platform

Pre-execution governance for AI agents. Deterministic PASS/FAIL/REVIEW verdicts, replayable proof.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher ai.geodesiclabs · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://app.geodesiclabs.ai/mcp

allow

verdict

rich-solo

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — rich-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster rich-solo · distinctiveness 0.663 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency254 ms

vs populationtypical

protocolcurrent

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools37

vs populationhigh

capabilities4

harnessA

Trust — can it rely on it?

identitysolo

servers on its host1

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_574ed2dbcc12d2f73fbef69d · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

account_status analyze_anomaly approve_rule authorize_execution check_blueprint_health check_drift check_realization compare_semantic_equivalence counterfactual create_blueprint create_chain decompose_failure delete_api_key delete_blueprint discover_patterns forecast geometric_confidence get_execution_trace get_inference_trace govern_inference handoff_audit list_api_keys list_blueprints load_rule_pack profile_blueprint_robustness recent_inference_decisions reject_rule repair repair_path rotate_api_key structural_types submit_chain_stage update_blueprint validate validate_repair verify_certificate verify_replay

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	37/37	✓
has a description	37/37	✓
description is substantive	37/37	✓
parameters are typed	37/37	✓
parameters are described	37/37	✓

37 of 37 tools graded · 37 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18

protocol version

—

session model

1.27.0

server version GeodesicAI

Capabilities: experimental prompts resources tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T19:57:35Z	ok_tools	200	254	2025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:32:53Z	ok_tools	200	251	2025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/ai.geodesiclabs/governance-platform.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/ai.geodesiclabs/governance-platform)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview