Should my agent depend on the MCP server com.52choujiang/wechat-channels-insights?

Verdict: allow — mid-slow-shared — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

SocialDataX 微信视频号 WeChat Channels MCP

com.52choujiang/wechat-channels-insights

WeChat Channels videos, comments, users, transcripts, and Official Account article details.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher com.52choujiang · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://mcp.socialdatax.com/wechat/mcp

allow

verdict

mid-slow-shared

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — mid-slow-shared — safe to depend on

Cluster mid-slow-shared · distinctiveness 0.709 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency1396 ms

vs populationslow

protocolcurrent

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools16

vs populationmid

capabilities5

harnessA

Trust — can it rely on it?

identityshared

servers on its host3

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_c2f44a4a03242f4e2e000e4a · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

socialdatax_get_points_balance wechat_get_hot_search_list wechat_get_mp_article_detail_by_url wechat_get_user_info_by_url wechat_get_user_info_by_user_id wechat_get_user_posted_videos_by_url wechat_get_user_posted_videos_by_user_id wechat_get_video_comment_replies_by_comment_id wechat_get_video_comments_by_object_id wechat_get_video_comments_by_url wechat_get_video_detail_by_encrypted_object_id wechat_get_video_detail_by_url wechat_get_video_speech_text_job wechat_search_videos wechat_submit_video_speech_text_by_encrypted_object_id wechat_submit_video_speech_text_by_video_url

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	16/16	✓
has a description	16/16	✓
description is substantive	8/16	8/16
parameters are typed	16/16	✓
parameters are described	16/16	✓

16 of 16 tools graded · 16 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18

protocol version

—

session model

3.0.0

server version wechat_mcp

Capabilities: experimental extensions prompts resources tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (2 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-14	inventory	tools 15 → 16
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T19:57:52Z	ok_tools	200	1396	2025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:33:08Z	ok_tools	200	1425	2025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/com.52choujiang/wechat-channels-insights.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/com.52choujiang/wechat-channels-insights)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview