Should my agent depend on the MCP server com.aex402/rpc?

Verdict: allow — mid-solo — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

aeX402 — Cross-Chain DeFi MCP: LINQ, AMM, Bridge, AI

com.aex402/rpc

Agent MCP for DeFi: cross-chain LINQ fan-out, AMM quotes/swaps, bridge, AI. Solana+EVM. Free+x402.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher com.aex402 · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://rpc.aex402.com/mcp

allow

verdict

mid-solo

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — mid-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster mid-solo · distinctiveness 0.181 (typical). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency189 ms

vs populationtypical

protocolcurrent

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools32

vs populationmid

capabilities1

harnessA

Trust — can it rely on it?

identitysolo

servers on its host1

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_994c8efe36bf79bf49a927f8 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

aex402_buildSwap aex402_getPool aex402_listPools aex402_quote aex402_rh_pool agent_delegate ai_chat api_get bridge_quote bridge_status describe_program discover_programs discovery_health evm_rpc fetch hl_info launch_token mcp_linq payment_help reconstruct_abi search search_tokens solana_buildTransfer solana_getAccountInfo solana_getBalance solana_getLatestBlockhash solana_getSignaturesForAddress solana_getSlot solana_getTokenAccountsByOwner solana_getTransaction solana_rpc solana_sendTransaction

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	32/32	✓
has a description	32/32	✓
description is substantive	31/32	31/32
parameters are typed	32/32	✓
parameters are described	32/32	✓

32 of 32 tools graded · 32 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18

protocol version

—

session model

0.2.0

server version rpc-aex402

Capabilities: tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T19:57:53Z	ok_tools	200	189	2025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:33:09Z	ok_tools	200	225	2025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/com.aex402/rpc.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/com.aex402/rpc)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview