Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

clipkit

dev.clipkit/clipkit

MCP server for Clipkit — gives AI agents a video toolbox via the Clipkit schema.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher dev.clipkit · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://www.clipkit.dev/mcp

allow
verdict
mid-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
15
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — mid-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster mid-solo · distinctiveness 0.173 (typical). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?
answersalive_tools
latency245 ms
vs populationtypical
protocolcurrent
authopen
Use — can it use it?
tools15
vs populationmid
capabilities2
harnessA
Trust — can it rely on it?
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers true0/0 agree

🔏 Signed receipt rr_eee6fd1e8181cb2e4815b92b · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. This server's 15 tools, classified, with what checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
action8changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
retrieval-public5serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
generative2creates contentno answer key exists; disclosure + stability checks, never truth verdicts

Tools last seen

add_element create_project create_promo delete_element describe_project edit_element get_project get_schema ingest_asset load_project open_in_editor preview_still read_docs set_project validate_project

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific15/15
has a description15/15
description is substantive15/15
parameters are typed15/15
parameters are described15/15

15 of 15 tools graded · 15 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

0/0 answers agree with the published primary source · 1 unverifiable.

claim classkeyverdictprimary source
tariff-dutyunmappedunverifiableus-hts

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
0.0.0
server version clipkit

Capabilities: resources tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools
raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:58:42Zok_tools2002452025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:33:56Zok_tools2004262025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/dev.clipkit/clipkit.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/dev.clipkit/clipkit)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview