Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

Hlido Agent Reviews

eu.hlido/mcp

Independent AI-agent reviews: trust checks, evidence scorecards, incident registry, recommendations.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher eu.hlido · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://hlido.eu/mcp

allow
verdict
stale-mid-slow-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
17
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — stale-mid-slow-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster stale-mid-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.329 (typical). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?
answersalive_tools
latency529 ms
vs populationslow
protocolstale
authopen
Use — can it use it?
tools17
vs populationmid
capabilities1
harnessA
Trust — can it rely on it?
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_33ff94be7efdf2c0bd90c9ec · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

commerce_check compare_agents explain find_similar_agents find_trusted get_behavioral_trace get_incidents get_scorecard recommend report_review_issue request_quick_audit scan_mcp submit_agent subscribe trust_check verify_claim verify_transparency

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific17/17
has a description17/17
description is substantive17/17
parameters are typed17/17
parameters are described16/1716/17

17 of 17 tools graded · 17 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2024-11-05
protocol version
session model
3.3.0-workers
server version hlido-agent-reviews

Capabilities: tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools
raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:58:47Zok_tools2005292024-11-05
2026-08-12T05:34:01Zok_tools2002642024-11-05

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/eu.hlido/mcp.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/eu.hlido/mcp)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview