Should my agent depend on the MCP server io.afterlaunch/agentic-growth-marketing?

Verdict: allow — stale-rich-slow-solo — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

AfterLaunch: the agentic growth marketing engine

io.afterlaunch/agentic-growth-marketing

Growth marketing, SEO and GEO as agent tools: ranked moves, ship them, AI answer visibility.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.afterlaunch · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://afterlaunch.io/api/mcp

allow

verdict

stale-rich-slow-solo

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — stale-rich-slow-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster stale-rich-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.498 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency400 ms

vs populationslow

protocolbehind

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools41

vs populationhigh

capabilities1

harnessA

Trust — can it rely on it?

identitysolo

servers on its host1

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_e5bc279692c8d352a69adc33 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

archive_move create_checkout create_topup disconnect_connection dismiss_gap get_activity get_competitors get_enrollment get_kb_page get_loop_status get_move get_outcomes get_output get_scoreboard get_seo get_setup_snippet get_snapshot get_standup get_visibility list_connections list_feed list_kb_pages list_outputs list_tracked_prompts poll_connection record_insight redraft_output refresh_scan replenish_feed run_loop set_loop_autonomy set_loop_cadence set_output_status ship_move skip_move start_connection track_prompt undo_move untrack_prompt update_draft whoami

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	41/41	✓
has a description	41/41	✓
description is substantive	41/41	✓
parameters are typed	41/41	✓
parameters are described	39/41	39/41

41 of 41 tools graded · 41 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-03-26

protocol version

—

session model

1.0.0

server version afterlaunch

Capabilities: tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (2 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-14	inventory	tools 40 → 41
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T19:58:50Z	ok_tools	200	400	2025-03-26
2026-08-12T05:34:04Z	ok_tools	200	248	2025-03-26

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.afterlaunch/agentic-growth-marketing.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.afterlaunch/agentic-growth-marketing)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview