Should my agent depend on the MCP server io.github.0xSardius/solenrich?

Verdict: allow — rich-solo — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

solenrich

io.github.0xSardius/solenrich

Solana onchain intelligence for AI agents: wallet risk, due-diligence, perps funding, smart money.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.0xSardius · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://api.solenrich.com/mcp

allow

verdict

rich-solo

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — rich-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster rich-solo · distinctiveness 0.364 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency112 ms

vs populationtypical

protocolcurrent

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools35

vs populationhigh

capabilities1

harnessA

Trust — can it rely on it?

identitysolo

servers on its host1

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_7f27cf051e01713956b2f130 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

attention_momentum batch_enrich check_alerts compare_tokens compare_wallets consensus_signal copy_trade_signals due_diligence enrich_token enrich_wallet feed_latest gacha_ev_scan hyperliquid_smart_money hyperliquid_trader_profile new_tokens parse_transaction perps_basis_signal perps_cross_venue_funding perps_market_structure perps_market_trend perps_trader_profile perps_venue_comparison portfolio_history protocol_profile query runner_scan smart_money_flow smart_money_trenches token_trend trenches_check trenches_scan trending_signals wallet_graph wallet_history whale_watch

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	34/35	34/35
has a description	35/35	✓
description is substantive	35/35	✓
parameters are typed	35/35	✓
parameters are described	35/35	✓

35 of 35 tools graded · 35 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18

protocol version

—

session model

1.0.0

server version SolEnrich

Capabilities: tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T19:58:52Z	ok_tools	200	112	2025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:34:06Z	ok_tools	200	164	2025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.0xSardius/solenrich.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.0xSardius/solenrich)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview