Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

agentdata nl

io.github.DarthSander/agentdata-nl

x402-paid tools: EU company & sanctions data, web search, LLM chat, crypto intel, x402 monitoring.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.DarthSander · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://agentdata-api.sander-van-aard.workers.dev/mcp

allow
verdict
rich-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
51
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · action ● · V n/a
allow — because answers ●, 51 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 2 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (2 attempts unverifiable, 0 disagreements)

Cluster rich-solo · distinctiveness 0.442 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency94 ms
vs populationtypical
protocolcurrent
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools51
vs populationhigh
capabilities1
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers true0/0 agree

🔏 Signed receipt rr_2b79ed10a2e8dd0d8ee9c36e · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 2 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?action ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?rich-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
action40changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
unclassified7not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
retrieval-public3serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
predictive1claims about the futurescoreable only in retrospect — the archive scores yesterday's predictions against today's outcome

Tools last seen observed

attest_settlement buy_phone_number check_ch_company check_crypto_firm check_crypto_signal check_cz_company check_dutch_insolvency check_fi_company check_fr_company check_fr_insolvency check_no_company check_pl_company check_token_registry check_uk_company check_x402_counterparty crypto_feed_since crypto_feed_subscribe crypto_track_record crypto_verdict eurc_peg file_agent_want get_crypto_evidence get_crypto_signal get_phone_code llm_chat lookup_lei news_search preflight_x402_service relay_crypto_news relay_edgar_filings relay_reddit_search request_capability scan_crypto_market screen_dutch_supplier screen_eu_sanctions screen_eu_supplier validate_crypto_signal verify_eu_vat web_contents web_crawl web_images web_places web_scholar web_search web_search_read x402_demand_report x402_network_feed_check x402_network_feed_since x402_network_feed_subscribe x402_network_report x402_service_report

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific51/51
has a description51/51
description is substantive51/51
parameters are typed51/51
parameters are described47/5147/51

51 of 51 tools graded · 51 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not yet confirmed — 2 attempt(s) currently unverifiable (rate limits, walls, or unmappable schemas — never counted against the server) · 0 disagreements.

claim classkeyverdictprimary source
OFAC SDN screening (vs the official list)ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPSunverifiableofac-sdn
OFAC SDN screening (vs the official list)MAERSK LINEunverifiableofac-sdn

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
0.3.0
server version agentdata-nl

Capabilities: tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:58:59Zok_tools200942025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:34:14Zok_tools2001092025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.DarthSander/agentdata-nl.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.DarthSander/agentdata-nl)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview