Should my agent depend on the MCP server io.github.MisfitMEdiAhouse/ghosbc-safety-gate?

Verdict: allow — mid-shared — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

GHOSBC Safety Gate

io.github.MisfitMEdiAhouse/ghosbc-safety-gate

Agent governance with A2A/Shopify/MCP trust audits, action screening, and decision UI.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.MisfitMEdiAhouse · first seen 2026-08-14 · endpoint https://cibcxqrqiqvzpardbdrw.supabase.co/functions/v1/ghosbc-safety-gate-mcp

allow

verdict

mid-shared

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — mid-shared — safe to depend on

Cluster mid-shared · distinctiveness 0.358 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency300 ms

vs populationtypical

protocolleading

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools9

vs populationmid

capabilities3

harnessB

Trust — can it rely on it?

identityshared

servers on its host3

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_de9d2c8987509cd329671412 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

audit_a2a_agent_card audit_mcp_dependency audit_shopify_agentic_storefront buy_policy_checks sanitize_agent_payload screen_agent_request screen_consequential_action screen_mcp_tool_definition validate_agent_response

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band B — usable, with rough edges.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	9/9	✓
has a description	9/9	✓
description is substantive	9/9	✓
parameters are typed	7/9	7/9
parameters are described	4/9	4/9

9 of 9 tools graded · 9 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2026-07-28

protocol version

—

session model

1.5.0

server version io.github.MisfitMEdiAhouse/ghosbc-safety-gate

Capabilities: extensions resources tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (1 shown, 2026-08-14 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-14	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T19:59:10Z	ok_tools	200	300	2026-07-28

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.MisfitMEdiAhouse/ghosbc-safety-gate.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.MisfitMEdiAhouse/ghosbc-safety-gate)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview