Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

AgentEconomy Compliance API

io.github.Piwe/compliance-api

Paid KYC, AML, and regulatory risk assessment over MCP via x402 USDC micropayments on Base.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.Piwe · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://api.netbrainis.co.za/mcp

allow
verdict
thin-slow-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
4
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — thin-slow-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster thin-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.468 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?
answersalive_tools
latency1034 ms
vs populationslow
protocolcurrent
authopen
Use — can it use it?
tools4
vs populationmid
capabilities1
harnessA
Trust — can it rely on it?
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers true0/0 agree

🔏 Signed receipt rr_cc5fe9e892aa06debe8f72cb · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. This server's 4 tools, classified, with what checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
action4changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions

Tools last seen

aml_screen kyc_check risk_report wallet_screen

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific4/4
has a description4/4
description is substantive4/4
parameters are typed4/4
parameters are described4/4

4 of 4 tools graded · 4 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

0/0 answers agree with the published primary source · 2 unverifiable.

claim classkeyverdictprimary source
OFAC SDN screening (vs the official list)ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPSunverifiableofac-sdn
OFAC SDN screening (vs the official list)MAERSK LINEunverifiableofac-sdn

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
1.0.0
server version compliance-api

Capabilities: tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools
raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:59:13Zok_tools20010342025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:34:27Zok_tools20011732025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.Piwe/compliance-api.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.Piwe/compliance-api)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview