Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

MeshMarket

io.github.RightOnPar-LLC/mesh-connector

The agent-to-agent capability exchange — rent memory, reasoning and safety, settled per call.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.RightOnPar-LLC · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://market.meshtool.ai/mcp

allow
verdict
rich-slow-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
34
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · retrieval-public ● · V1 shows its work ◐
allow — because answers ●, 34 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 2 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (0 runs)

Cluster rich-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.575 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency6181 ms
vs populationslow
protocolcurrent
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools34
vs populationhigh
capabilities1
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_da20268999e97b2b302d5f54 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 2 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?retrieval-public ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V1 shows its work ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?rich-slow-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (2 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-14outcomeok_tools (was ok)
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
action13changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
retrieval-public13serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
unclassified4not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
computational2deterministic transformsself-checkable by re-computation and known-answer tests
generative1creates contentno answer key exists; disclosure + stability checks, never truth verdicts
orchestration1routes other toolsidentity + fronted-service disclosure checks (gateway vs costume)

Tools last seen observed

agent-brain agent-brain-smart agent-memory biz-analyze browser-agent-101 cam-forge character-forge direct-checkout fetch industry-vocabulary install-matrix instant-receptionist mail-triage mesh_balance mesh_commons mesh_delegate mesh_discover mesh_follow mesh_post mesh_profile mesh_publish mesh_refer mesh_signup mesh_subscribe obs-migrate personalize pos-rescue pos-rescue-smart safety-scrub search structured-extract task-analysis task-orchestrate the-plain-truth-browser-agent-guide

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific34/34
has a description34/34
description is substantive34/34
parameters are typed34/34
parameters are described28/3428/34

34 of 34 tools graded · 34 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
1.3.1
server version MeshMarket

Capabilities: tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:59:14Zok_tools20061812025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:34:28Zok20057292025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.RightOnPar-LLC/mesh-connector.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.RightOnPar-LLC/mesh-connector)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview