Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

rankparse mcp

io.github.abhibavishi/rankparse-mcp

SEO MCP server — backlinks, domain authority, tech stack, and 18+ tools via Common Crawl.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.abhibavishi · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://mcp.rankparse.com/mcp

allow
verdict
rich-slow-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
59
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · retrieval-public ● · V3 has answer key ◐
allow — because answers ●, 59 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 2 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (1 attempts unverifiable, 0 disagreements)

Cluster rich-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.661 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency10702 ms
vs populationslow
protocolcurrent
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools59
vs populationhigh
capabilities1
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers true0/0 agree

🔏 Signed receipt rr_c15a66d40435ccc298be6456 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 2 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?retrieval-public ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V3 has answer key ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?rich-slow-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (2 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-14inventorytools 46 → 59
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
retrieval-public52serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
action6changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
generative1creates contentno answer key exists; disclosure + stability checks, never truth verdicts

Tools last seen observed

batch_lookup check_credits get_anchor_text get_backlinks get_competitor_gap get_crawl_history get_domain_authority get_domain_overlap get_domain_rank get_google_ads_accounts get_google_ads_keyword_ideas get_google_ads_keyword_metrics get_gsc_country_breakdown get_gsc_date_trends get_gsc_device_breakdown get_gsc_low_ctr_pages get_gsc_low_ctr_queries get_gsc_opportunity_queries get_gsc_page_queries get_gsc_page_segment get_gsc_page_trend get_gsc_properties get_gsc_query_page_pairs get_gsc_query_pages get_gsc_query_trend get_gsc_search_appearance get_gsc_sitemaps get_gsc_top_pages get_gsc_top_queries get_gsc_url_inspection get_internal_links get_link_audit get_link_intersect get_link_velocity get_lost_links get_new_links get_outbound_links get_page_performance get_page_seo get_platform_domains get_platform_trends get_referring_domains get_schema_markup get_similar_domains get_site_explorer get_site_health get_sitemap get_tech_stack get_top_pages outreach_add_contacts outreach_configure_sending outreach_create_campaign outreach_get_campaign outreach_launch_campaign outreach_list_campaigns outreach_pause_campaign outreach_resume_campaign outreach_sending_status outreach_suggest_prospects

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific59/59
has a description59/59
description is substantive53/5953/59
parameters are typed59/59
parameters are described34/5934/59

59 of 59 tools graded · 59 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not yet confirmed — 1 attempt(s) currently unverifiable (rate limits, walls, or unmappable schemas — never counted against the server) · 0 disagreements.

claim classkeyverdictprimary source
tariff-dutyunmappedunverifiableus-hts

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
1.0.0
server version rankparse

Capabilities: tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:59:20Zok_tools200107022025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:34:33Zok_tools200106852025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.abhibavishi/rankparse-mcp.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.abhibavishi/rankparse-mcp)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview