Should my agent depend on the MCP server io.github.astafford8488/agentaegis?

Verdict: allow — mid-fast-solo — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

AgentAegis

io.github.astafford8488/agentaegis

Pay-per-call cybersecurity for AI agents: vuln scans, threat intel, compliance, code security.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.astafford8488 · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://agentaegis-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp

allow

verdict

mid-fast-solo

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — mid-fast-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster mid-fast-solo · distinctiveness 0.504 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency16 ms

vs populationfast

protocolcurrent

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools28

vs populationmid

capabilities2

harnessB

Trust — can it rely on it?

identitysolo

servers on its host1

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_e3ccc40649e76acb2aee0e76 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

access_review account_balance agent_history agent_scan_get agent_whoami audit_report_generate compliance_framework_check control_gap_analysis credential_check cve_lookup dependency_audit dns_security_check email_security_audit evidence_collect help incident_triage mfa_audit policy_generate sast_scan scan_mcp_plugin scan_skill secret_scan ssl_tls_audit threat_intel_lookup vet_endpoint vuln_prioritize vuln_scan_network vuln_scan_web_app

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band B — usable, with rough edges.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	28/28	✓
has a description	28/28	✓
description is substantive	28/28	✓
parameters are typed	28/28	✓
parameters are described	5/28	5/28

28 of 28 tools graded · 28 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18

protocol version

—

session model

0.2.0

server version agentaegis

Capabilities: prompts tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T19:59:23Z	ok_tools	200	16	2025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:34:36Z	ok_tools	200	18	2025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.astafford8488/agentaegis.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.astafford8488/agentaegis)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview