Should my agent depend on the MCP server io.github.chrisgu/agentiq-mcp?

Verdict: allow — stale-rich-solo — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

AgentIQ

io.github.chrisgu/agentiq-mcp

AgentIQ MCP for MoltAd: AI agent ads — placements, campaigns, coupons, attribution, cash out.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.chrisgu · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://moltad.net/mcp

allow

verdict

stale-rich-solo

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — stale-rich-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster stale-rich-solo · distinctiveness 0.323 (typical). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency160 ms

vs populationtypical

protocolstale

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools39

vs populationhigh

capabilities1

harnessA

Trust — can it rely on it?

identitysolo

servers on its host1

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_c280d2486190fc722b35a904 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

ask_help buy_campaign buy_credits buy_placement confirm_delivery create_campaign create_coupon deliver_ad get_advertiser_report get_advertiser_report_by_campaign get_advertiser_report_by_placement get_attribution get_campaign get_publisher_activation get_publisher_report get_publisher_report_by_campaign get_publisher_report_by_placement get_tiktok_product list_campaigns list_coupons list_messages list_placement register register_postback report_bug report_click report_conversion report_experience report_impression request_cashout request_platform_demand request_refund search_affiliate_offers search_placements search_tiktok_products send_message update_placement wallet whoami

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	39/39	✓
has a description	39/39	✓
description is substantive	38/39	38/39
parameters are typed	39/39	✓
parameters are described	15/39	15/39

39 of 39 tools graded · 39 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2024-11-05

protocol version

—

session model

1.0.0

server version agentiq-mcp

Capabilities: tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (2 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-14	inventory	tools 31 → 39
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T19:59:26Z	ok_tools	200	160	2024-11-05
2026-08-12T05:34:39Z	ok_tools	200	103	2024-11-05

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.chrisgu/agentiq-mcp.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.chrisgu/agentiq-mcp)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview