Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

semi data

io.github.codebiwan/semi-data

US-government semiconductor & quantum supply-chain intelligence: controls, entities, funding.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.codebiwan · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://semidata.dev/v1/mcp

allow
verdict
mid-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
6
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — mid-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster mid-solo · distinctiveness 0.175 (typical). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?
answersalive_tools
latency114 ms
vs populationtypical
protocolcurrent
authopen
Use — can it use it?
tools6
vs populationmid
capabilities1
harnessA
Trust — can it rely on it?
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers true0/0 agree

🔏 Signed receipt rr_903f40e6581a9e9ac34420ba · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. This server's 6 tools, classified, with what checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
retrieval-public4serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
action2changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions

Tools last seen

get_quantum_funding get_trade_flows search_mineral_deposits search_regulatory_signals search_restricted_entities search_sec_filings

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific6/6
has a description6/6
description is substantive6/6
parameters are typed6/6
parameters are described6/6

6 of 6 tools graded · 6 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

0/0 answers agree with the published primary source · 3 unverifiable.

claim classkeyverdictprimary source
OFAC SDN screening (vs the official list)ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPSunverifiableofac-sdn
OFAC SDN screening (vs the official list)MAERSK LINEunverifiableofac-sdn
tariff-dutyunmappedunverifiableus-hts

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
1.0.0
server version semi-data

Capabilities: tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools
raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:59:27Zok_tools2001142025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:34:39Zok_tools200892025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.codebiwan/semi-data.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.codebiwan/semi-data)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview