Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

intelligence mcp

io.github.goodmeta/intelligence-mcp

Agent payments ecosystem intelligence. Scans GitHub/HN/npm across AP2, ACP, x402, MPP, UCP.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.goodmeta · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://intel.goodmeta.co/mcp

allow
verdict
thin-slow-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
3
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — thin-slow-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster thin-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.682 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?
answersalive_tools
latency515 ms
vs populationslow
protocolcurrent
authopen
Use — can it use it?
tools3
vs populationlow
capabilities3
harnessA
Trust — can it rely on it?
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_455ea2639c168a5f02308ba9 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. This server's 3 tools, classified, with what checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
retrieval-public3serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full

Tools last seen

compare_protocols get_protocol_info scan_opportunities

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific3/3
has a description3/3
description is substantive3/3
parameters are typed3/3
parameters are described3/3

3 of 3 tools graded · 3 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
0.1.5
server version intelligence

Capabilities: prompts resources tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools
raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:59:34Zok_tools2005152025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:34:47Zok_tools2002762025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.goodmeta/intelligence-mcp.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.goodmeta/intelligence-mcp)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview