Should my agent depend on the MCP server io.github.mcp-dir/nuvemshop-mcp?

Verdict: allow — gateway — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

Nuvemshop

io.github.mcp-dir/nuvemshop-mcp

Nuvemshop (Tiendanube) e-commerce platform, your store's products, orders, customers, categories and

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.mcp-dir · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://api.mcp.ai/p_nuvemshop

allow

verdict

gateway

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — gateway — safe to depend on

Cluster gateway · distinctiveness 0.383 (moderate). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency686 ms

vs populationslow

protocolcurrent

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools24

vs populationmid

capabilities1

harnessB

Trust — can it rely on it?

identityfarm_member

servers on its host99

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_c5c9936ad9dde40b789e9a60 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

authenticate connect marketplace nuvemshop_categories nuvemshop_coupons nuvemshop_coupons_write_create nuvemshop_customers_get nuvemshop_customers_list nuvemshop_list_accounts nuvemshop_orders_get nuvemshop_orders_list nuvemshop_orders_write_cancel nuvemshop_orders_write_close nuvemshop_orders_write_fulfill nuvemshop_orders_write_open nuvemshop_orders_write_pack nuvemshop_orders_write_update nuvemshop_products_get nuvemshop_products_list nuvemshop_products_write_create nuvemshop_products_write_update report_bug show_version toolkit_info

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band B — usable, with rough edges.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	24/24	✓
has a description	24/24	✓
description is substantive	24/24	✓
parameters are typed	24/24	✓
parameters are described	3/24	3/24

24 of 24 tools graded · 24 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18

protocol version

—

session model

0.9.241

server version mcp-ai

Capabilities: tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T19:59:49Z	ok_tools	200	686	2025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:35:01Z	ok_tools	200	5706	2025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.mcp-dir/nuvemshop-mcp.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.mcp-dir/nuvemshop-mcp)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview