Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

mainstreet

io.github.philpof102-svg/mainstreet

Reputation oracle for AI agents on Base: SAFE/CAUTION/BLOCK + 0-100 score before you pay. x402+MCP

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.philpof102-svg · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://avisradar-production.up.railway.app/mcp

allow
verdict
stale-rich-fast-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
43
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · kind unknown · V n/a
allow — because answers ●, 43 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 2 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (1 attempts unverifiable, 0 disagreements)

Cluster stale-rich-fast-solo · distinctiveness 0.625 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency25 ms
vs populationfast
protocolstale
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools43
vs populationhigh
capabilities1
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers true0/0 agree

🔏 Signed receipt rr_a23f4f0b5587ae59fd6f8f29 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 2 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?kind unknown ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?stale-rich-fast-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
unclassified18not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
action17changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
retrieval-public8serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full

Tools last seen observed

lawbor_bind_did lawbor_council lawbor_explore lawbor_gate lawbor_m10_tip lawbor_m1_send lawbor_m2_post lawbor_m9_upvote lawbor_neighbors lawbor_orchestrate lawbor_peer_trust lawbor_profile lawbor_quorum lawbor_repo_trust lawbor_route lawbor_scout lawbor_validate lawbor_validations mainstreet_agents_of_interest mainstreet_attestation mainstreet_audit_info mainstreet_bazaar_scored mainstreet_catalog mainstreet_collusion mainstreet_compare mainstreet_deployer mainstreet_erc8004_weighted mainstreet_find_verified mainstreet_leaderboard mainstreet_match mainstreet_onchain_info mainstreet_pick mainstreet_preflight mainstreet_repeat_rate mainstreet_revenue mainstreet_score mainstreet_scores_batch mainstreet_signal mainstreet_top_buyers mainstreet_top_raters mainstreet_verify mainstreet_verify_settlement mainstreet_vet

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific43/43
has a description43/43
description is substantive43/43
parameters are typed43/43
parameters are described19/4319/43

43 of 43 tools graded · 43 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not yet confirmed — 1 attempt(s) currently unverifiable (rate limits, walls, or unmappable schemas — never counted against the server) · 0 disagreements.

claim classkeyverdictprimary source
tariff-dutyunmappedunverifiableus-hts

Protocol conformance observed

2024-11-05
protocol version
session model
0.9.0
server version MainStreet

Capabilities: tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T19:59:56Zok_tools200252024-11-05
2026-08-12T05:35:12Zok_tools200262024-11-05

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.philpof102-svg/mainstreet.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.philpof102-svg/mainstreet)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview