Should my agent depend on the MCP server io.github.quantustik/mcp?

Verdict: allow — mid-slow-solo — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

mcp

io.github.quantustik/mcp

Live S&P 500 quantum-model signals, forecasts and trade plans. Educational, not financial advice.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.quantustik · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://quantustik.com/mcp

allow

verdict

mid-slow-solo

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — mid-slow-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster mid-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.645 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency453 ms

vs populationslow

protocolcurrent

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools26

vs populationmid

capabilities4

harnessA

Trust — can it rely on it?

identitysolo

servers on its host1

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_e0d5487d3f89e72acad78722 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

explain_signal fetch get_correlation_map get_earnings_calendar get_fear_greed get_filing_language_diff get_filings_digest get_forecast get_insider_pulse get_institutional_activity get_market_indicators get_market_overview get_market_regime get_risk_state get_risk_state_evidence get_signal get_signal_history get_signals_batch get_started get_ticker_indicators get_track_record get_trade_plan list_capabilities scan_universe search top_opportunities

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	26/26	✓
has a description	26/26	✓
description is substantive	26/26	✓
parameters are typed	26/26	✓
parameters are described	8/26	8/26

26 of 26 tools graded · 26 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18

protocol version

—

session model

2.0.4

server version Quantustik

Capabilities: experimental prompts resources tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (2 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-14	inventory	tools 24 → 26
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T20:00:09Z	ok_tools	200	453	2025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:35:21Z	ok_tools	200	398	2025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.quantustik/mcp.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.quantustik/mcp)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview