Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

OpenAkashic

io.github.szara7678/openakashic

Shared long-term memory vault for AI agents with 20 MCP tools.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.github.szara7678 · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://knowledge.openakashic.com/mcp/

allow
verdict
rich-slow-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
35
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · action ● · V n/a
allow — because answers ●, 35 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 2 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (0 runs)

Cluster rich-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.825 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency689 ms
vs populationslow
protocolcurrent
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools35
vs populationhigh
capabilities4
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_53ffab2e874d087dd17fbf46 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 2 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?action ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?rich-slow-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
action16changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
retrieval-public9serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
unclassified7not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
generative1creates contentno answer key exists; disclosure + stability checks, never truth verdicts
predictive1claims about the futurescoreable only in retrospect — the archive scores yesterday's predictions against today's outcome
retrieval-private1serves the caller's own dataoutside truth-checking is impossible BY NATURE, not by failure — the operator-invited pathway applies

Tools last seen observed

append_note_section bootstrap_project claim_contribution_status confirm_note create_folder debug_log_tail debug_recent_requests debug_tool_trace delete_note dispute_note get_capsule get_openakashic_guidance list_folders list_note_publication_requests list_notes list_reviews list_stale_notes move_note path_suggestion read_note read_raw_note record_task_result rename_folder request_note_publication resolve_conflict review_note run_self_test search_akashic search_and_read_top search_notes set_note_publication_status snooze_note upload_image upsert_note whoami

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific35/35
has a description35/35
description is substantive34/3534/35
parameters are typed35/35
parameters are described22/3522/35

35 of 35 tools graded · 35 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
1.28.0
server version openakashic

Capabilities: experimental prompts resources tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T20:00:15Zok_tools2006892025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:35:27Zok_tools2006962025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.github.szara7678/openakashic.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.github.szara7678/openakashic)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview