Should my agent depend on the MCP server io.scanbimlabs/scanbim-mcp?

Verdict: allow — stale-mid-shared — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

ScanBIM MCP

io.scanbimlabs/scanbim-mcp

AI Hub for AEC — 50+ 3D formats, clash detection, ACC integration via Autodesk Platform Services.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher io.scanbimlabs · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://scanbim-mcp.itmartin24.workers.dev/mcp

allow

verdict

stale-mid-shared

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — stale-mid-shared — safe to depend on

Cluster stale-mid-shared · distinctiveness 0.17 (typical). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency244 ms

vs populationtypical

protocolstale

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools19

vs populationmid

capabilities1

harnessA

Trust — can it rely on it?

identityshared

servers on its host1

servers on its domain5

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_17a87bf743cbb521198b0f17 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

acc_create_issue acc_create_rfi acc_list_issues acc_list_projects acc_list_rfis acc_project_summary acc_search_documents detect_clashes get_model_metadata get_supported_formats get_viewer_link list_models lumion_render twinmotion_render twinmotion_walkthrough upload_model xr_launch_ar_session xr_launch_vr_session xr_list_sessions

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	19/19	✓
has a description	19/19	✓
description is substantive	19/19	✓
parameters are typed	19/19	✓
parameters are described	19/19	✓

19 of 19 tools graded · 19 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2024-11-05

protocol version

—

session model

1.0.5

server version scanbim-mcp

Capabilities: tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T20:00:24Z	ok_tools	200	244	2024-11-05
2026-08-12T05:35:36Z	ok_tools	200	63	2024-11-05

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/io.scanbimlabs/scanbim-mcp.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/io.scanbimlabs/scanbim-mcp)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview