Should my agent depend on the MCP server me.ceki/mcp-server?

Verdict: allow — rich-slow-solo — safe to depend on As of 2026-08-15T11:28:18Z: a dated observation with receipts, not a warranty.

mcp server

me.ceki/mcp-server

Hire specialists by the hour — search, schedule, and pay via MCP protocol.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher me.ceki · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://api.ceki.me/mcp/agent

allow

verdict

rich-slow-solo

cluster

ok_tools

answers

tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow — rich-slow-solo — safe to depend on

Cluster rich-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.822 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server census — see the whole spectrum.

Reach — can an agent get to it?

answersalive_tools

latency722 ms

vs populationslow

protocolcurrent

authopen

Use — can it use it?

tools50

vs populationhigh

capabilities3

harnessA

Trust — can it rely on it?

identitysolo

servers on its host1

verifiabilityunassessed

duplicate inventoryno

drift events0

answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_adfc48995fa1404845bd9f4d · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Tools last seen

add-contract-member book-event call-human comment create-contract-event create-schedule create-topup-invoice delete-schedule get-contract get-contract-events get-contract-members get-crypto-list get-event get-event-children get-event-history get-hire-jobs get-my-bookings get-my-contracts get-my-events get-my-jobs get-owner-connect-link get-pending-corrections get-pricing get-profile get-schedule get-schedules get-user get-wallet get-wallet-transactions get-wallet-usage list-my-browsers post-job propose-correction regenerate-key register-agent remove-contract-member rent-browser request-withdrawal resend-verification search-browsers search-specialists select-currency timelog-check timelog-start timelog-stop update-profile update-schedule upload-file verify-email vote-correction

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility check	tools passing	ok
name is clear & specific	50/50	✓
has a description	50/50	✓
description is substantive	50/50	✓
parameters are typed	50/50	✓
parameters are described	50/50	✓

50 of 50 tools graded · 50 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18

protocol version

—

session model

0.0.1

server version Laravel MCP Server

Capabilities: prompts resources tools

Drift

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)

date	type	what changed
2026-08-12	outcome	first probe: ok_tools

raw probe records

probed (UTC)	outcome	http	ms	protocol
2026-08-14T20:00:31Z	ok_tools	200	722	2025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:35:46Z	ok_tools	200	662	2025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/me.ceki/mcp-server.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/me.ceki/mcp-server)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview