Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

taiwan law

tw.org.legaltech/taiwan-law

Taiwan legal research MCP: 判決書、全國法規、釋字/憲判與立法歷程查詢,12 個工具,回應均附官方出處 URL。

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher tw.org.legaltech · first seen 2026-08-14 · endpoint https://legaltech.org.tw/mcp

allow
verdict
mid-slow-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
14
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · retrieval-public ● · V0 take its word ◐
allow — because answers ●, 14 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 1 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (0 runs)

Cluster mid-slow-solo · distinctiveness 0.301 (typical). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency511 ms
vs populationslow
protocolcurrent
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools14
vs populationmid
capabilities1
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers trueno primary

🔏 Signed receipt rr_386a50fed950a3a1beb2f967 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 1 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?retrieval-public ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V0 take its word ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?mid-slow-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (1 shown, 2026-08-14 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-14outcomefirst probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
retrieval-public12serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
generative1creates contentno answer key exists; disclosure + stability checks, never truth verdicts
unclassified1not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves

Tools last seen observed

analyze_legal_intent get_moj_draft_announcements get_taiwan_interpretation get_taiwan_interpretation_citations get_taiwan_judgment get_taiwan_law_progress get_taiwan_law_versions get_taiwan_pcode search_moj_interpretations search_taiwan_bills search_taiwan_interpretations search_taiwan_judgments search_taiwan_laws search_taiwan_regulations

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific14/14
has a description14/14
description is substantive14/14
parameters are typed14/14
parameters are described7/147/14

14 of 14 tools graded · 14 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not in the Tier-2 trade lane, or not yet checked. Tier-2 re-derives a server's answers against published primary sources — see truth checks.

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
0.3.0
server version taiwan-legal-research

Capabilities: tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T20:00:47Zok_tools2005112025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/tw.org.legaltech/taiwan-law.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/tw.org.legaltech/taiwan-law)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview