Robin Saige we check the tools AI agents call

mcp server

xyz.lonestaroracle/mcp-server

45 AI data tools for agents — crypto, DeFi risk, audits, equities, energy, and more.

— the operator's own registry description reported

Publisher xyz.lonestaroracle · first seen 2026-08-12 · endpoint https://mcp.lonestaroracle.xyz/mcp

allow
verdict
rich-fast-solo
cluster
ok_tools
answers
54
tools served

Dependency rating derived

allow
allow — alive & usable · kind unknown · V n/a
allow — because answers ●, 54 tools legible (band A) ●, no confirmed drift in 2 probes ●; not yet checked: truth (1 attempts unverifiable, 0 disagreements)

Cluster rich-fast-solo · distinctiveness 0.818 (unusual). Every figure is a percentile or class within the 11,094-server censussee the whole spectrum.

Does it answer? Q1 · observed
answersalive_tools
latency56 ms
vs populationfast
protocolcurrent
authopen
Can it be used? Q4 · observed
tools54
vs populationhigh
capabilities6
harnessA
Did it hold when checked? Q3–Q4 · derived
identitysolo
servers on its host1
verifiabilityunassessed
duplicate inventoryno
drift events0
answers true0/0 agree

🔏 Signed receipt rr_ee0b4e3fcff956978f4787b8 · ed25519 · key rs-rcpt-2026-08 — this rating is tamper-evident; an agent gets the full signature from check_server and can verify it against the published key.

Q1Does it answer?alive & usable — 2 probes ●evidence ↓
Q2What is it?kind unknown ● evidence ↓
Q3Can it be checked?V n/a for this kind ◐evidence ↓
Q4Did it hold?harness A · truth not yet run · no drift ●evidence ↓
Q5What company does it keep?rich-fast-solo · 1 on its host (context, not verdict) ◐evidence ↓

● observed · ◐ derived · ○ reported — the verdict synthesizes Q1–Q4; Q5 is context. Methodology →

History observed

Every probe we made, oldest → newest (2 shown, 2026-08-12 → 2026-08-14). Green answered · amber answered-but-walled · red no useful answer. A gap in our cadence is a gap in coverage, not evidence about the server.

changelog (1 events)
datetypewhat changed
2026-08-12outcomefirst probe: ok_tools

What kind of tools these are derived

Verification only means something relative to a tool's NATURE — an email-sender has no "true answer", a generator has no answer key. Classification evidence: classified from tool names/descriptions/annotations WE OBSERVED. What checking applies to each kind (the full methodology →):

naturetoolsmeaning what checking applies
unclassified31not classifiable from its textTier-1 only until its tools describe themselves
retrieval-public10serves public factstruth-checkable against a public source — the V-ladder applies in full
action9changes the worldno true answer exists; we check the CONTRACT (destructive/read-only/idempotent declarations, error legibility) and never fire real actions
computational3deterministic transformsself-checkable by re-computation and known-answer tests
predictive1claims about the futurescoreable only in retrospect — the archive scores yesterday's predictions against today's outcome

Tools last seen observed

aerocheck_pool agricultural_commodities analyst_ratings bundle_scope cascade_watch chainscout_intelligence congress_signal congress_trades consumer_pulse content_forge contract_check cycle_pulse defi_risk earnings_calendar energy_markets equity_analysis funding_rates geo_pulse gov_edge gov_edge_opportunities gpu_compute_prices grid_intelligence hire_floyd industrial_metals insider_trading labor_pulse latam_pulse lease_edge liquidations macro_indicators move_contract_audit multi_timeframe_scan news_sentiment open_interest options_flow pdf_to_markdown portfolio_risk real_estate_pulse rust_contract_audit rwa_risk smart_contract_audit stablecoin_pulse staking_yields strategic_materials supply_chain_intelligence tech_analysis token_due_diligence token_launches trade_pulse wallet_pnl wallet_risk wealth_pulse weather_forecast whale_alert

Harness readiness observed

Can an agent's harness pick this tool and call it correctly? Graded on the three things an agent reads — name, description, typed parameters. Band A — an agent can pick and call these reliably.

legibility checktools passingok
name is clear & specific54/54
has a description54/54
description is substantive54/54
parameters are typed54/54
parameters are described17/5417/54

54 of 54 tools graded · 54 with a captured input schema. RS-008, Tier-1 — no domain knowledge, applies to any tool. “Alive” is not the same as “usable”.

Truth checks observed

Not yet confirmed — 1 attempt(s) currently unverifiable (rate limits, walls, or unmappable schemas — never counted against the server) · 0 disagreements.

claim classkeyverdictprimary source
fx-ratesEURUSDunverifiableecb-fx

Protocol conformance observed

2025-06-18
protocol version
session model
3.2.4
server version LoneStarOracle

Capabilities: experimental extensions logging prompts resources tools

Drift observed

No confirmed drift on record. Baseline set 2026-08-14; changes appear here after human review.

raw probe records
probed (UTC) outcomehttpmsprotocol
2026-08-14T20:00:49Zok_tools200562025-06-18
2026-08-12T05:36:03Zok_tools200492025-06-18

Watch or embed this verdict

verdict badge

Operators: put the live verdict in your README — it updates with every census, links back here, and is a dated observation, never a warranty:

[![Robin Saige verdict](https://robinsaige.com/badge/xyz.lonestaroracle/mcp-server.svg)](https://robinsaige.com/s/xyz.lonestaroracle/mcp-server)

Depend on it? Subscribe to its change feed — outcome changes and confirmed drift, no account needed. Building on it? The full dossier as JSON — verdict, rating, truth checks, history — stable enough to gate CI on.

← overview